2A: Spatial Weights and Application

Author

Su Sandi Cho Win

Published

November 21, 2023

Modified

November 23, 2023

1. Overview

In this exercise, I learn to calculate spatial weights in R. The core of my learning revolves around computing spatial weights, allowing me to understand the spatial relationships and dependencies within my data. Moreover, I gain hands-on experience in generating spatially lagged variables, which enables me to conduct in-depth analyses and interpret geospatial data with a nuanced perspective.

2. Getting Started

The following code chunk installs and loads sf, readr, dplyr, spdep, tmap and purrr packages into R environment.

Note

sf package is used to import geospatial data into my working environment.

spdep package is used to calculate spatial weights and compute spatially lagged variables.

tmap package is used to create thematic maps in R.

tidyverse package is used to provide a unified and consistent set of data manipulation and visualization tools for data analysis and exploration.

knitr package is used to enable dynamic report generation and literate programming.

pacman::p_load(sf, spdep, tmap, tidyverse, knitr)

The data sets used are:

  • Hunan county boundary layer, in ESRI shapefile format.

  • Hunan_2012.csv which contains selected Hunan’s local development indicators in 2012.

3. Getting the Data Into R Environment

3.1. Importing Shapefile into R Environment

The following code chunk utilizes the st_read() function from the sf package to import the Hunan shapefile into R, creating a simple feature data frame named hunan.

hunan <- st_read(dsn = "data/geospatial", 
                 layer = "Hunan")
Reading layer `Hunan' from data source 
  `D:\scwsu\ISSS624\Hands-on_Ex2\data\geospatial' using driver `ESRI Shapefile'
Simple feature collection with 88 features and 7 fields
Geometry type: POLYGON
Dimension:     XY
Bounding box:  xmin: 108.7831 ymin: 24.6342 xmax: 114.2544 ymax: 30.12812
Geodetic CRS:  WGS 84

3.2. Importing CSV File into R Environment

The following code chunk utilizes the st_read() function from the sf package to import the Hunan_2012.csv file into R, creating a R dataframe class named hunan2012.

hunan2012 <- read_csv("data/aspatial/Hunan_2012.csv")

3.3. Performing Relational Join

The following code chunks utilizes the left_join() function from the dplyr package to update the attribute table of hunan’s undefinedygons DataFrame with the attribute fields of hunan2012 dataframe.

hunan <- left_join(hunan,hunan2012)%>%
  select(1:4, 7, 15)

3.4. Visualising Regional Development Indicator

The following code chunk utilizes qtm() function from the tmap package to build a basemap and choropleth map showing the distribution of GDPPC 2012.

Note

GDPPC stands for “Gross Domestic Product Per Capita”. It is a measure of a region’s economic output that accounts for its number of people. The GDP per capita is often considered an indicator of a country’s standard of living, although it is not a measure of personal income.

basemap <- tm_shape(hunan) +
  tm_polygons() +
  tm_text("NAME_3", size=0.5)

gdppc <- qtm(hunan, "GDPPC")
tmap_arrange(basemap, gdppc, asp=1, ncol=2)

3.5. Computing Contiguity Spatial Weights

3.5.1. Computing (QUEEN) Contiguity Based Neighbors

The following code chunk utilizes the poly2nb() function form the spdep package to create contiguity weight matrices for the study area. This function constructs a list of neighbors where the regions share contiguous boundaries and also allows for a queen argument, which can be set to TRUE (default setting) or FALSE. If the argument is not explicitly set to “queen = FALSE”, the function will generate a list of first-order neighbors based on the Queen’s contiguity criterion.

wm_q <- poly2nb(hunan, queen=TRUE)
summary(wm_q)
Neighbour list object:
Number of regions: 88 
Number of nonzero links: 448 
Percentage nonzero weights: 5.785124 
Average number of links: 5.090909 
Link number distribution:

 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9 11 
 2  2 12 16 24 14 11  4  2  1 
2 least connected regions:
30 65 with 1 link
1 most connected region:
85 with 11 links

The summary report indicates that in Hunan, there are 88 area units. Among these, the most connected area unit is surrounded by 11 neighbors. On the other hand, there are two area units that have only one neighbor each.

Note

In the analysis, the object wm_q provides a list of neighboring polygons for each polygon in our study. For instance, to view the neighbors of the first polygon in this object, a specific command is used to extract this information.

wm_q[[1]]
[1]  2  3  4 57 85

Polygon 1 within the Hunan SpatialPolygons DataFrame class has 5 neighbors. These neighbors are identified by their respective polygon IDs, which are numerical representations assigned to each polygon in the dataset.

The following code chunk is used to retrieve the country name of Polygon ID = 1.

hunan$County[1]
[1] "Anxiang"

The output reveals that Polygon ID=1 is Anxiang county.

The following code chunk is used to reveal the country names of the five neighboring polygons.

hunan$NAME_3[c(2,3,4,57,85)]
[1] "Hanshou" "Jinshi"  "Li"      "Nan"     "Taoyuan"

The following code chunk is used to retrieve the GDPPC of these five countries.

nb1 <- wm_q[[1]]
nb1 <- hunan$GDPPC[nb1]
nb1
[1] 20981 34592 24473 21311 22879

The result above states that the GDPPC of the five nearest neighbors based on Queen’s method are 20981, 34592, 24473, 21311 and 22879 respectively.

The following code chunk utilizes str() function to display the complete weight matrix.

str(wm_q)
List of 88
 $ : int [1:5] 2 3 4 57 85
 $ : int [1:5] 1 57 58 78 85
 $ : int [1:4] 1 4 5 85
 $ : int [1:4] 1 3 5 6
 $ : int [1:4] 3 4 6 85
 $ : int [1:5] 4 5 69 75 85
 $ : int [1:4] 67 71 74 84
 $ : int [1:7] 9 46 47 56 78 80 86
 $ : int [1:6] 8 66 68 78 84 86
 $ : int [1:8] 16 17 19 20 22 70 72 73
 $ : int [1:3] 14 17 72
 $ : int [1:5] 13 60 61 63 83
 $ : int [1:4] 12 15 60 83
 $ : int [1:3] 11 15 17
 $ : int [1:4] 13 14 17 83
 $ : int [1:5] 10 17 22 72 83
 $ : int [1:7] 10 11 14 15 16 72 83
 $ : int [1:5] 20 22 23 77 83
 $ : int [1:6] 10 20 21 73 74 86
 $ : int [1:7] 10 18 19 21 22 23 82
 $ : int [1:5] 19 20 35 82 86
 $ : int [1:5] 10 16 18 20 83
 $ : int [1:7] 18 20 38 41 77 79 82
 $ : int [1:5] 25 28 31 32 54
 $ : int [1:5] 24 28 31 33 81
 $ : int [1:4] 27 33 42 81
 $ : int [1:3] 26 29 42
 $ : int [1:5] 24 25 33 49 54
 $ : int [1:3] 27 37 42
 $ : int 33
 $ : int [1:8] 24 25 32 36 39 40 56 81
 $ : int [1:8] 24 31 50 54 55 56 75 85
 $ : int [1:5] 25 26 28 30 81
 $ : int [1:3] 36 45 80
 $ : int [1:6] 21 41 47 80 82 86
 $ : int [1:6] 31 34 40 45 56 80
 $ : int [1:4] 29 42 43 44
 $ : int [1:4] 23 44 77 79
 $ : int [1:5] 31 40 42 43 81
 $ : int [1:6] 31 36 39 43 45 79
 $ : int [1:6] 23 35 45 79 80 82
 $ : int [1:7] 26 27 29 37 39 43 81
 $ : int [1:6] 37 39 40 42 44 79
 $ : int [1:4] 37 38 43 79
 $ : int [1:6] 34 36 40 41 79 80
 $ : int [1:3] 8 47 86
 $ : int [1:5] 8 35 46 80 86
 $ : int [1:5] 50 51 52 53 55
 $ : int [1:4] 28 51 52 54
 $ : int [1:5] 32 48 52 54 55
 $ : int [1:3] 48 49 52
 $ : int [1:5] 48 49 50 51 54
 $ : int [1:3] 48 55 75
 $ : int [1:6] 24 28 32 49 50 52
 $ : int [1:5] 32 48 50 53 75
 $ : int [1:7] 8 31 32 36 78 80 85
 $ : int [1:6] 1 2 58 64 76 85
 $ : int [1:5] 2 57 68 76 78
 $ : int [1:4] 60 61 87 88
 $ : int [1:4] 12 13 59 61
 $ : int [1:7] 12 59 60 62 63 77 87
 $ : int [1:3] 61 77 87
 $ : int [1:4] 12 61 77 83
 $ : int [1:2] 57 76
 $ : int 76
 $ : int [1:5] 9 67 68 76 84
 $ : int [1:4] 7 66 76 84
 $ : int [1:5] 9 58 66 76 78
 $ : int [1:3] 6 75 85
 $ : int [1:3] 10 72 73
 $ : int [1:3] 7 73 74
 $ : int [1:5] 10 11 16 17 70
 $ : int [1:5] 10 19 70 71 74
 $ : int [1:6] 7 19 71 73 84 86
 $ : int [1:6] 6 32 53 55 69 85
 $ : int [1:7] 57 58 64 65 66 67 68
 $ : int [1:7] 18 23 38 61 62 63 83
 $ : int [1:7] 2 8 9 56 58 68 85
 $ : int [1:7] 23 38 40 41 43 44 45
 $ : int [1:8] 8 34 35 36 41 45 47 56
 $ : int [1:6] 25 26 31 33 39 42
 $ : int [1:5] 20 21 23 35 41
 $ : int [1:9] 12 13 15 16 17 18 22 63 77
 $ : int [1:6] 7 9 66 67 74 86
 $ : int [1:11] 1 2 3 5 6 32 56 57 69 75 ...
 $ : int [1:9] 8 9 19 21 35 46 47 74 84
 $ : int [1:4] 59 61 62 88
 $ : int [1:2] 59 87
 - attr(*, "class")= chr "nb"
 - attr(*, "region.id")= chr [1:88] "1" "2" "3" "4" ...
 - attr(*, "call")= language poly2nb(pl = hunan, queen = TRUE)
 - attr(*, "type")= chr "queen"
 - attr(*, "sym")= logi TRUE

3.5.2. Creating (ROOK) contiguity based neighbours

The following code chunk is used to compute Rook contiguity weight matrix.

wm_r <- poly2nb(hunan, queen=FALSE)
summary(wm_r)
Neighbour list object:
Number of regions: 88 
Number of nonzero links: 440 
Percentage nonzero weights: 5.681818 
Average number of links: 5 
Link number distribution:

 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9 10 
 2  2 12 20 21 14 11  3  2  1 
2 least connected regions:
30 65 with 1 link
1 most connected region:
85 with 10 links

The summary above reveals that in Hunan, there are a total of 88 area units. Among these, the area unit with the highest connectivity has 10 neighbors. Additionally, it is noted that there are two distinct area units that have only one neighbor each.

3.5.3. Visualising contiguity weights

A connectivity graph that visualizes lines connecting neighboring points is created. Since we are dealing with polygons, I first need to convert these into points. The most common approach for this is to use the centroids of the polygons. Functions from the sf package are used to calculate these centroids.

Specifically, I need to extract the latitude and longitude of each centroid to create a connectivity graph. This requires a bit more than just applying the st_centroid function to the us.bound sf object. To achieve this, I utilize a mapping function that applies a specific function to each element of a vector, returning a vector of equal length. My input vector is the geometry column of us.bound, and the function used is st_centroid.

The map_dbl function from the purrr package is employed to map st_centroid over the geometry column of us.bound. To extract the longitude values, I used double bracket notation [[]] with 1, which allowed me to get the first value (longitude) from each centroid. This method effectively provided the necessary longitude and latitude coordinates for each centroid in a separate dataframe, setting the stage for creating the connectivity graph.

longitude <- purrr::map_dbl(hunan$geometry, ~st_centroid(.x)[[1]])

Similar process is done to obtain the latitude values of the centroids, however with a crucial difference. Instead of accessing the first value of each centroid, I access the second value by using double bracket notation [[2]] in the mapping function. This approach allows me to extract the latitude, which is typically the second value in the coordinate pair of each centroid.

latitude <- map_dbl(hunan$geometry, ~st_centroid(.x)[[2]])

Having obtained both the latitude and longitude coordinates for each centroid, I then combine these two sets of data into a single object. This is accomplished using the cbind function in R, which binds the two vectors column-wise. Applying cbind creates a single data frame where each row corresponds to a centroid, with one column for longitude and another for latitude. This consolidated data structure is essential for my subsequent analysis and for constructing the connectivity graph.

coords <- cbind(longitude, latitude)

After combining the latitude and longitude data, the first few rows of this merged dataset are checked to ensure correct formatting. This verification step is essential to confirm the proper alignment and accuracy of the data for further analysis.

head(coords)
     longitude latitude
[1,]  112.1531 29.44362
[2,]  112.0372 28.86489
[3,]  111.8917 29.47107
[4,]  111.7031 29.74499
[5,]  111.6138 29.49258
[6,]  111.0341 29.79863

3.5.3.1 Plotting Queen, Rook, Both Queen and Rook Contiguity Based Neighbours Maps

plot(hunan$geometry, border="lightgrey")
plot(wm_q, coords, pch = 19, cex = 0.6, add = TRUE, col= "red")

plot(hunan$geometry, border="lightgrey")
plot(wm_r, coords, pch = 19, cex = 0.6, add = TRUE, col = "red")

par(mfrow=c(1,2))
plot(hunan$geometry, border="lightgrey")
plot(wm_q, coords, pch = 19, cex = 0.6, add = TRUE, col= "red", main="Queen Contiguity")
plot(hunan$geometry, border="lightgrey")
plot(wm_r, coords, pch = 19, cex = 0.6, add = TRUE, col = "red", main="Rook Contiguity")

3.6. Computing Distance Based Neighbors

In this part of the exercise, I focus on creating distance-based weight matrices using the dnearneigh() function from the spdep package. This function determines neighboring region points based on Euclidean distance, confined within specified distance bounds (lower d1= and upper d2= bounds) set by the bounds= argument. Additionally, if the coordinates used are unprojected and either specified in the coordinates object x or represented as a two-column matrix with longlat=TRUE, the function calculates great circle distances in kilometers, assuming the WGS84 reference ellipsoid. This approach is crucial for accurately determining spatial relationships based on geographic distance.

3.6.1. Determining the Cut-off Distance

To determine the upper limit for the distance band, I follow these steps:

  1. Use knearneigh() function from the spdep package to generate a matrix containing the indices of points that are the k nearest neighbors of each other.

  2. Transform the object returned by knearneigh() into a neighbors list of class nb. This was achieved by using the knn2nb() function, which converts the knn object into a list of integer vectors, each vector containing the neighbor region number IDs.

  3. Employ the nbdists() function from spdep to calculate the lengths of the edges connecting each pair of neighbors. This function returns the lengths in the units of the coordinates if they are projected, or in kilometers if they are not.

  4. Use the unlist() function to remove the list structure from the object returned by nbdists(), thereby simplifying the data for further analysis. This step was essential for accurately establishing the distance-based relationships between the different regional units.

#coords <- coordinates(hunan)
k1 <- knn2nb(knearneigh(coords))
k1dists <- unlist(nbdists(k1, coords, longlat = TRUE))
summary(k1dists)
   Min. 1st Qu.  Median    Mean 3rd Qu.    Max. 
  24.79   32.57   38.01   39.07   44.52   61.79

The summary above indicates that the maximum distance to the nearest neighbor among the units is 61.79 kilometers. Based on this, I set 61.79 km as the upper threshold for the distance band in my analysis. This decision ensures that every unit in the study is guaranteed to have at least one neighbor within this specified distance range, thus maintaining the integrity and relevance of the spatial relationships in the data.

3.6.2. Computing Fixed Distance Weight Matrix

The following code chunk uses dnearneigh() function to compute the distance weight matrix.

wm_d62 <- dnearneigh(coords, 0, 62, longlat = TRUE)
wm_d62
Neighbour list object:
Number of regions: 88 
Number of nonzero links: 324 
Percentage nonzero weights: 4.183884 
Average number of links: 3.681818
Note

The result reveals that the “Average number of links” is 3.681818. The “Average number of links: 3.681818” in the summary of the wm_d62 object indicates the average number of neighbors each region has within the specified distance range. Specifically, it means that on average, each of the 88 regions in the dataset has about 3.68 neighboring regions (or links) within a distance of up to 62 kilometers. This average is calculated based on the total number of links (or neighbor connections) across all regions, divided by the total number of regions. It provides a measure of how interconnected the regions are within the defined distance threshold.

The following code chunk uses str() to display the content from wm_d62 weight matrix.

str(wm_d62)
List of 88
 $ : int [1:5] 3 4 5 57 64
 $ : int [1:4] 57 58 78 85
 $ : int [1:4] 1 4 5 57
 $ : int [1:3] 1 3 5
 $ : int [1:4] 1 3 4 85
 $ : int 69
 $ : int [1:2] 67 84
 $ : int [1:4] 9 46 47 78
 $ : int [1:4] 8 46 68 84
 $ : int [1:4] 16 22 70 72
 $ : int [1:3] 14 17 72
 $ : int [1:5] 13 60 61 63 83
 $ : int [1:4] 12 15 60 83
 $ : int [1:2] 11 17
 $ : int 13
 $ : int [1:4] 10 17 22 83
 $ : int [1:3] 11 14 16
 $ : int [1:3] 20 22 63
 $ : int [1:5] 20 21 73 74 82
 $ : int [1:5] 18 19 21 22 82
 $ : int [1:6] 19 20 35 74 82 86
 $ : int [1:4] 10 16 18 20
 $ : int [1:3] 41 77 82
 $ : int [1:4] 25 28 31 54
 $ : int [1:4] 24 28 33 81
 $ : int [1:4] 27 33 42 81
 $ : int [1:2] 26 29
 $ : int [1:6] 24 25 33 49 52 54
 $ : int [1:2] 27 37
 $ : int 33
 $ : int [1:2] 24 36
 $ : int 50
 $ : int [1:5] 25 26 28 30 81
 $ : int [1:3] 36 45 80
 $ : int [1:6] 21 41 46 47 80 82
 $ : int [1:5] 31 34 45 56 80
 $ : int [1:2] 29 42
 $ : int [1:3] 44 77 79
 $ : int [1:4] 40 42 43 81
 $ : int [1:3] 39 45 79
 $ : int [1:5] 23 35 45 79 82
 $ : int [1:5] 26 37 39 43 81
 $ : int [1:3] 39 42 44
 $ : int [1:2] 38 43
 $ : int [1:6] 34 36 40 41 79 80
 $ : int [1:5] 8 9 35 47 86
 $ : int [1:5] 8 35 46 80 86
 $ : int [1:5] 50 51 52 53 55
 $ : int [1:4] 28 51 52 54
 $ : int [1:6] 32 48 51 52 54 55
 $ : int [1:4] 48 49 50 52
 $ : int [1:6] 28 48 49 50 51 54
 $ : int [1:2] 48 55
 $ : int [1:5] 24 28 49 50 52
 $ : int [1:4] 48 50 53 75
 $ : int 36
 $ : int [1:5] 1 2 3 58 64
 $ : int [1:5] 2 57 64 66 68
 $ : int [1:3] 60 87 88
 $ : int [1:4] 12 13 59 61
 $ : int [1:5] 12 60 62 63 87
 $ : int [1:4] 61 63 77 87
 $ : int [1:5] 12 18 61 62 83
 $ : int [1:4] 1 57 58 76
 $ : int 76
 $ : int [1:5] 58 67 68 76 84
 $ : int [1:2] 7 66
 $ : int [1:4] 9 58 66 84
 $ : int [1:2] 6 75
 $ : int [1:3] 10 72 73
 $ : int [1:2] 73 74
 $ : int [1:3] 10 11 70
 $ : int [1:4] 19 70 71 74
 $ : int [1:5] 19 21 71 73 86
 $ : int [1:2] 55 69
 $ : int [1:3] 64 65 66
 $ : int [1:3] 23 38 62
 $ : int [1:2] 2 8
 $ : int [1:4] 38 40 41 45
 $ : int [1:5] 34 35 36 45 47
 $ : int [1:5] 25 26 33 39 42
 $ : int [1:6] 19 20 21 23 35 41
 $ : int [1:4] 12 13 16 63
 $ : int [1:4] 7 9 66 68
 $ : int [1:2] 2 5
 $ : int [1:4] 21 46 47 74
 $ : int [1:4] 59 61 62 88
 $ : int [1:2] 59 87
 - attr(*, "class")= chr "nb"
 - attr(*, "region.id")= chr [1:88] "1" "2" "3" "4" ...
 - attr(*, "call")= language dnearneigh(x = coords, d1 = 0, d2 = 62, longlat = TRUE)
 - attr(*, "dnn")= num [1:2] 0 62
 - attr(*, "bounds")= chr [1:2] "GE" "LE"
 - attr(*, "nbtype")= chr "distance"
 - attr(*, "sym")= logi TRUE

Combined table() and card() functions of spdep package can also be used to display the structure of the weight matrix.

table(hunan$County, card(wm_d62))
               
                1 2 3 4 5 6
  Anhua         1 0 0 0 0 0
  Anren         0 0 0 1 0 0
  Anxiang       0 0 0 0 1 0
  Baojing       0 0 0 0 1 0
  Chaling       0 0 1 0 0 0
  Changning     0 0 1 0 0 0
  Changsha      0 0 0 1 0 0
  Chengbu       0 1 0 0 0 0
  Chenxi        0 0 0 1 0 0
  Cili          0 1 0 0 0 0
  Dao           0 0 0 1 0 0
  Dongan        0 0 1 0 0 0
  Dongkou       0 0 0 1 0 0
  Fenghuang     0 0 0 1 0 0
  Guidong       0 0 1 0 0 0
  Guiyang       0 0 0 1 0 0
  Guzhang       0 0 0 0 0 1
  Hanshou       0 0 0 1 0 0
  Hengdong      0 0 0 0 1 0
  Hengnan       0 0 0 0 1 0
  Hengshan      0 0 0 0 0 1
  Hengyang      0 0 0 0 0 1
  Hongjiang     0 0 0 0 1 0
  Huarong       0 0 0 1 0 0
  Huayuan       0 0 0 1 0 0
  Huitong       0 0 0 1 0 0
  Jiahe         0 0 0 0 1 0
  Jianghua      0 0 1 0 0 0
  Jiangyong     0 1 0 0 0 0
  Jingzhou      0 1 0 0 0 0
  Jinshi        0 0 0 1 0 0
  Jishou        0 0 0 0 0 1
  Lanshan       0 0 0 1 0 0
  Leiyang       0 0 0 1 0 0
  Lengshuijiang 0 0 1 0 0 0
  Li            0 0 1 0 0 0
  Lianyuan      0 0 0 0 1 0
  Liling        0 1 0 0 0 0
  Linli         0 0 0 1 0 0
  Linwu         0 0 0 1 0 0
  Linxiang      1 0 0 0 0 0
  Liuyang       0 1 0 0 0 0
  Longhui       0 0 1 0 0 0
  Longshan      0 1 0 0 0 0
  Luxi          0 0 0 0 1 0
  Mayang        0 0 0 0 0 1
  Miluo         0 0 0 0 1 0
  Nan           0 0 0 0 1 0
  Ningxiang     0 0 0 1 0 0
  Ningyuan      0 0 0 0 1 0
  Pingjiang     0 1 0 0 0 0
  Qidong        0 0 1 0 0 0
  Qiyang        0 0 1 0 0 0
  Rucheng       0 1 0 0 0 0
  Sangzhi       0 1 0 0 0 0
  Shaodong      0 0 0 0 1 0
  Shaoshan      0 0 0 0 1 0
  Shaoyang      0 0 0 1 0 0
  Shimen        1 0 0 0 0 0
  Shuangfeng    0 0 0 0 0 1
  Shuangpai     0 0 0 1 0 0
  Suining       0 0 0 0 1 0
  Taojiang      0 1 0 0 0 0
  Taoyuan       0 1 0 0 0 0
  Tongdao       0 1 0 0 0 0
  Wangcheng     0 0 0 1 0 0
  Wugang        0 0 1 0 0 0
  Xiangtan      0 0 0 1 0 0
  Xiangxiang    0 0 0 0 1 0
  Xiangyin      0 0 0 1 0 0
  Xinhua        0 0 0 0 1 0
  Xinhuang      1 0 0 0 0 0
  Xinning       0 1 0 0 0 0
  Xinshao       0 0 0 0 0 1
  Xintian       0 0 0 0 1 0
  Xupu          0 1 0 0 0 0
  Yanling       0 0 1 0 0 0
  Yizhang       1 0 0 0 0 0
  Yongshun      0 0 0 1 0 0
  Yongxing      0 0 0 1 0 0
  You           0 0 0 1 0 0
  Yuanjiang     0 0 0 0 1 0
  Yuanling      1 0 0 0 0 0
  Yueyang       0 0 1 0 0 0
  Zhijiang      0 0 0 0 1 0
  Zhongfang     0 0 0 1 0 0
  Zhuzhou       0 0 0 0 1 0
  Zixing        0 0 1 0 0 0

3.6.2.1. Plotting Fixed Distance Weight Matrix

plot(hunan$geometry, border="lightgrey")
plot(wm_d62, coords, add=TRUE)
plot(k1, coords, add=TRUE, col="red", length=0.08)

par(mfrow=c(1,2))
plot(hunan$geometry, main="1st nearest neighbours", border="lightgrey")
plot(k1, coords, add=TRUE, col="red", length=0.08)
plot(hunan$geometry, main="Distance link", border="lightgrey")
plot(wm_d62, coords, add=TRUE, pch = 19, cex = 0.6)

Note

In the spatial data visualization, red lines indicate connections to each region’s nearest neighbor, while black lines represent links to all neighbors within a 62 km cut-off distance. This distinction visually differentiates between immediate and broader spatial relationships among regions.

3.6.3. Computing Adaptive Distance Weight Matrix

One characteristic of the fixed distance weight matrix is its tendency to reflect higher neighbor counts in densely populated areas, typically urban, and lower counts in sparsely populated areas, usually rural. This occurs because the matrix considers all regions within a fixed distance, resulting in urban areas having more neighbors due to their density. This effect smooths out the neighbor relationships across a larger number of neighbors.

However, to manage the number of neighbors more directly, the approach of k-nearest neighbors can be employed. This method allows for specifying the exact number of neighbors for each region, providing the option to either accept asymmetrical neighbor relationships or enforce symmetry. The choice between these options can significantly influence the analysis, as shown in the following code chunk.

knn6 <- knn2nb(knearneigh(coords, k=6))
knn6
Neighbour list object:
Number of regions: 88 
Number of nonzero links: 528 
Percentage nonzero weights: 6.818182 
Average number of links: 6 
Non-symmetric neighbours list

Similarly, we can display the content of the matrix by using str().

str(knn6)
List of 88
 $ : int [1:6] 2 3 4 5 57 64
 $ : int [1:6] 1 3 57 58 78 85
 $ : int [1:6] 1 2 4 5 57 85
 $ : int [1:6] 1 3 5 6 69 85
 $ : int [1:6] 1 3 4 6 69 85
 $ : int [1:6] 3 4 5 69 75 85
 $ : int [1:6] 9 66 67 71 74 84
 $ : int [1:6] 9 46 47 78 80 86
 $ : int [1:6] 8 46 66 68 84 86
 $ : int [1:6] 16 19 22 70 72 73
 $ : int [1:6] 10 14 16 17 70 72
 $ : int [1:6] 13 15 60 61 63 83
 $ : int [1:6] 12 15 60 61 63 83
 $ : int [1:6] 11 15 16 17 72 83
 $ : int [1:6] 12 13 14 17 60 83
 $ : int [1:6] 10 11 17 22 72 83
 $ : int [1:6] 10 11 14 16 72 83
 $ : int [1:6] 20 22 23 63 77 83
 $ : int [1:6] 10 20 21 73 74 82
 $ : int [1:6] 18 19 21 22 23 82
 $ : int [1:6] 19 20 35 74 82 86
 $ : int [1:6] 10 16 18 19 20 83
 $ : int [1:6] 18 20 41 77 79 82
 $ : int [1:6] 25 28 31 52 54 81
 $ : int [1:6] 24 28 31 33 54 81
 $ : int [1:6] 25 27 29 33 42 81
 $ : int [1:6] 26 29 30 37 42 81
 $ : int [1:6] 24 25 33 49 52 54
 $ : int [1:6] 26 27 37 42 43 81
 $ : int [1:6] 26 27 28 33 49 81
 $ : int [1:6] 24 25 36 39 40 54
 $ : int [1:6] 24 31 50 54 55 56
 $ : int [1:6] 25 26 28 30 49 81
 $ : int [1:6] 36 40 41 45 56 80
 $ : int [1:6] 21 41 46 47 80 82
 $ : int [1:6] 31 34 40 45 56 80
 $ : int [1:6] 26 27 29 42 43 44
 $ : int [1:6] 23 43 44 62 77 79
 $ : int [1:6] 25 40 42 43 44 81
 $ : int [1:6] 31 36 39 43 45 79
 $ : int [1:6] 23 35 45 79 80 82
 $ : int [1:6] 26 27 37 39 43 81
 $ : int [1:6] 37 39 40 42 44 79
 $ : int [1:6] 37 38 39 42 43 79
 $ : int [1:6] 34 36 40 41 79 80
 $ : int [1:6] 8 9 35 47 78 86
 $ : int [1:6] 8 21 35 46 80 86
 $ : int [1:6] 49 50 51 52 53 55
 $ : int [1:6] 28 33 48 51 52 54
 $ : int [1:6] 32 48 51 52 54 55
 $ : int [1:6] 28 48 49 50 52 54
 $ : int [1:6] 28 48 49 50 51 54
 $ : int [1:6] 48 50 51 52 55 75
 $ : int [1:6] 24 28 49 50 51 52
 $ : int [1:6] 32 48 50 52 53 75
 $ : int [1:6] 32 34 36 78 80 85
 $ : int [1:6] 1 2 3 58 64 68
 $ : int [1:6] 2 57 64 66 68 78
 $ : int [1:6] 12 13 60 61 87 88
 $ : int [1:6] 12 13 59 61 63 87
 $ : int [1:6] 12 13 60 62 63 87
 $ : int [1:6] 12 38 61 63 77 87
 $ : int [1:6] 12 18 60 61 62 83
 $ : int [1:6] 1 3 57 58 68 76
 $ : int [1:6] 58 64 66 67 68 76
 $ : int [1:6] 9 58 67 68 76 84
 $ : int [1:6] 7 65 66 68 76 84
 $ : int [1:6] 9 57 58 66 78 84
 $ : int [1:6] 4 5 6 32 75 85
 $ : int [1:6] 10 16 19 22 72 73
 $ : int [1:6] 7 19 73 74 84 86
 $ : int [1:6] 10 11 14 16 17 70
 $ : int [1:6] 10 19 21 70 71 74
 $ : int [1:6] 19 21 71 73 84 86
 $ : int [1:6] 6 32 50 53 55 69
 $ : int [1:6] 58 64 65 66 67 68
 $ : int [1:6] 18 23 38 61 62 63
 $ : int [1:6] 2 8 9 46 58 68
 $ : int [1:6] 38 40 41 43 44 45
 $ : int [1:6] 34 35 36 41 45 47
 $ : int [1:6] 25 26 28 33 39 42
 $ : int [1:6] 19 20 21 23 35 41
 $ : int [1:6] 12 13 15 16 22 63
 $ : int [1:6] 7 9 66 68 71 74
 $ : int [1:6] 2 3 4 5 56 69
 $ : int [1:6] 8 9 21 46 47 74
 $ : int [1:6] 59 60 61 62 63 88
 $ : int [1:6] 59 60 61 62 63 87
 - attr(*, "region.id")= chr [1:88] "1" "2" "3" "4" ...
 - attr(*, "call")= language knearneigh(x = coords, k = 6)
 - attr(*, "sym")= logi FALSE
 - attr(*, "type")= chr "knn"
 - attr(*, "knn-k")= num 6
 - attr(*, "class")= chr "nb"
Note

In the analysis using the k-nearest neighbors method, it is observed that each county consistently has exactly six neighbors. This uniformity in the number of neighbors for each county is ensured by the method’s design, which sets a fixed number of nearest neighbors (in this case, six) for every region, regardless of their geographical size or population density. This approach guarantees that every county is equally considered in terms of its immediate spatial relationships.

3.6.3.1. Plotting Distance Based Neighbors

plot(hunan$geometry, border="lightgrey")
plot(knn6, coords, pch = 19, cex = 0.6, add = TRUE, col = "red")

3.7. Weights Based On IDW

The following code chunk uses nbdists() from the spdep package to compute the distances between areas.

dist <- nbdists(wm_q, coords, longlat = TRUE)
ids <- lapply(dist, function(x) 1/(x))
ids
[[1]]
[1] 0.01535405 0.03916350 0.01820896 0.02807922 0.01145113

[[2]]
[1] 0.01535405 0.01764308 0.01925924 0.02323898 0.01719350

[[3]]
[1] 0.03916350 0.02822040 0.03695795 0.01395765

[[4]]
[1] 0.01820896 0.02822040 0.03414741 0.01539065

[[5]]
[1] 0.03695795 0.03414741 0.01524598 0.01618354

[[6]]
[1] 0.015390649 0.015245977 0.021748129 0.011883901 0.009810297

[[7]]
[1] 0.01708612 0.01473997 0.01150924 0.01872915

[[8]]
[1] 0.02022144 0.03453056 0.02529256 0.01036340 0.02284457 0.01500600 0.01515314

[[9]]
[1] 0.02022144 0.01574888 0.02109502 0.01508028 0.02902705 0.01502980

[[10]]
[1] 0.02281552 0.01387777 0.01538326 0.01346650 0.02100510 0.02631658 0.01874863
[8] 0.01500046

[[11]]
[1] 0.01882869 0.02243492 0.02247473

[[12]]
[1] 0.02779227 0.02419652 0.02333385 0.02986130 0.02335429

[[13]]
[1] 0.02779227 0.02650020 0.02670323 0.01714243

[[14]]
[1] 0.01882869 0.01233868 0.02098555

[[15]]
[1] 0.02650020 0.01233868 0.01096284 0.01562226

[[16]]
[1] 0.02281552 0.02466962 0.02765018 0.01476814 0.01671430

[[17]]
[1] 0.01387777 0.02243492 0.02098555 0.01096284 0.02466962 0.01593341 0.01437996

[[18]]
[1] 0.02039779 0.02032767 0.01481665 0.01473691 0.01459380

[[19]]
[1] 0.01538326 0.01926323 0.02668415 0.02140253 0.01613589 0.01412874

[[20]]
[1] 0.01346650 0.02039779 0.01926323 0.01723025 0.02153130 0.01469240 0.02327034

[[21]]
[1] 0.02668415 0.01723025 0.01766299 0.02644986 0.02163800

[[22]]
[1] 0.02100510 0.02765018 0.02032767 0.02153130 0.01489296

[[23]]
[1] 0.01481665 0.01469240 0.01401432 0.02246233 0.01880425 0.01530458 0.01849605

[[24]]
[1] 0.02354598 0.01837201 0.02607264 0.01220154 0.02514180

[[25]]
[1] 0.02354598 0.02188032 0.01577283 0.01949232 0.02947957

[[26]]
[1] 0.02155798 0.01745522 0.02212108 0.02220532

[[27]]
[1] 0.02155798 0.02490625 0.01562326

[[28]]
[1] 0.01837201 0.02188032 0.02229549 0.03076171 0.02039506

[[29]]
[1] 0.02490625 0.01686587 0.01395022

[[30]]
[1] 0.02090587

[[31]]
[1] 0.02607264 0.01577283 0.01219005 0.01724850 0.01229012 0.01609781 0.01139438
[8] 0.01150130

[[32]]
[1] 0.01220154 0.01219005 0.01712515 0.01340413 0.01280928 0.01198216 0.01053374
[8] 0.01065655

[[33]]
[1] 0.01949232 0.01745522 0.02229549 0.02090587 0.01979045

[[34]]
[1] 0.03113041 0.03589551 0.02882915

[[35]]
[1] 0.01766299 0.02185795 0.02616766 0.02111721 0.02108253 0.01509020

[[36]]
[1] 0.01724850 0.03113041 0.01571707 0.01860991 0.02073549 0.01680129

[[37]]
[1] 0.01686587 0.02234793 0.01510990 0.01550676

[[38]]
[1] 0.01401432 0.02407426 0.02276151 0.01719415

[[39]]
[1] 0.01229012 0.02172543 0.01711924 0.02629732 0.01896385

[[40]]
[1] 0.01609781 0.01571707 0.02172543 0.01506473 0.01987922 0.01894207

[[41]]
[1] 0.02246233 0.02185795 0.02205991 0.01912542 0.01601083 0.01742892

[[42]]
[1] 0.02212108 0.01562326 0.01395022 0.02234793 0.01711924 0.01836831 0.01683518

[[43]]
[1] 0.01510990 0.02629732 0.01506473 0.01836831 0.03112027 0.01530782

[[44]]
[1] 0.01550676 0.02407426 0.03112027 0.01486508

[[45]]
[1] 0.03589551 0.01860991 0.01987922 0.02205991 0.02107101 0.01982700

[[46]]
[1] 0.03453056 0.04033752 0.02689769

[[47]]
[1] 0.02529256 0.02616766 0.04033752 0.01949145 0.02181458

[[48]]
[1] 0.02313819 0.03370576 0.02289485 0.01630057 0.01818085

[[49]]
[1] 0.03076171 0.02138091 0.02394529 0.01990000

[[50]]
[1] 0.01712515 0.02313819 0.02551427 0.02051530 0.02187179

[[51]]
[1] 0.03370576 0.02138091 0.02873854

[[52]]
[1] 0.02289485 0.02394529 0.02551427 0.02873854 0.03516672

[[53]]
[1] 0.01630057 0.01979945 0.01253977

[[54]]
[1] 0.02514180 0.02039506 0.01340413 0.01990000 0.02051530 0.03516672

[[55]]
[1] 0.01280928 0.01818085 0.02187179 0.01979945 0.01882298

[[56]]
[1] 0.01036340 0.01139438 0.01198216 0.02073549 0.01214479 0.01362855 0.01341697

[[57]]
[1] 0.028079221 0.017643082 0.031423501 0.029114131 0.013520292 0.009903702

[[58]]
[1] 0.01925924 0.03142350 0.02722997 0.01434859 0.01567192

[[59]]
[1] 0.01696711 0.01265572 0.01667105 0.01785036

[[60]]
[1] 0.02419652 0.02670323 0.01696711 0.02343040

[[61]]
[1] 0.02333385 0.01265572 0.02343040 0.02514093 0.02790764 0.01219751 0.02362452

[[62]]
[1] 0.02514093 0.02002219 0.02110260

[[63]]
[1] 0.02986130 0.02790764 0.01407043 0.01805987

[[64]]
[1] 0.02911413 0.01689892

[[65]]
[1] 0.02471705

[[66]]
[1] 0.01574888 0.01726461 0.03068853 0.01954805 0.01810569

[[67]]
[1] 0.01708612 0.01726461 0.01349843 0.01361172

[[68]]
[1] 0.02109502 0.02722997 0.03068853 0.01406357 0.01546511

[[69]]
[1] 0.02174813 0.01645838 0.01419926

[[70]]
[1] 0.02631658 0.01963168 0.02278487

[[71]]
[1] 0.01473997 0.01838483 0.03197403

[[72]]
[1] 0.01874863 0.02247473 0.01476814 0.01593341 0.01963168

[[73]]
[1] 0.01500046 0.02140253 0.02278487 0.01838483 0.01652709

[[74]]
[1] 0.01150924 0.01613589 0.03197403 0.01652709 0.01342099 0.02864567

[[75]]
[1] 0.011883901 0.010533736 0.012539774 0.018822977 0.016458383 0.008217581

[[76]]
[1] 0.01352029 0.01434859 0.01689892 0.02471705 0.01954805 0.01349843 0.01406357

[[77]]
[1] 0.014736909 0.018804247 0.022761507 0.012197506 0.020022195 0.014070428
[7] 0.008440896

[[78]]
[1] 0.02323898 0.02284457 0.01508028 0.01214479 0.01567192 0.01546511 0.01140779

[[79]]
[1] 0.01530458 0.01719415 0.01894207 0.01912542 0.01530782 0.01486508 0.02107101

[[80]]
[1] 0.01500600 0.02882915 0.02111721 0.01680129 0.01601083 0.01982700 0.01949145
[8] 0.01362855

[[81]]
[1] 0.02947957 0.02220532 0.01150130 0.01979045 0.01896385 0.01683518

[[82]]
[1] 0.02327034 0.02644986 0.01849605 0.02108253 0.01742892

[[83]]
[1] 0.023354289 0.017142433 0.015622258 0.016714303 0.014379961 0.014593799
[7] 0.014892965 0.018059871 0.008440896

[[84]]
[1] 0.01872915 0.02902705 0.01810569 0.01361172 0.01342099 0.01297994

[[85]]
 [1] 0.011451133 0.017193502 0.013957649 0.016183544 0.009810297 0.010656545
 [7] 0.013416965 0.009903702 0.014199260 0.008217581 0.011407794

[[86]]
[1] 0.01515314 0.01502980 0.01412874 0.02163800 0.01509020 0.02689769 0.02181458
[8] 0.02864567 0.01297994

[[87]]
[1] 0.01667105 0.02362452 0.02110260 0.02058034

[[88]]
[1] 0.01785036 0.02058034

3.7.1. Row-standardized Weights Matrix

Next in the process, I assign weights to each neighboring polygon. In this scenario, every neighboring polygon is given an equal weight, designated as style “W”. This is achieved by assigning the fraction 1 divided by the number of neighbors to each neighboring county and then summing up the weighted values. This approach, while straightforward and intuitive for summarizing neighbor values, does have a limitation. Specifically, polygons at the edges of the study area, having fewer neighbors, might result in their lagged values being over- or under-estimated, which could skew the understanding of spatial autocorrelation in the data. For the purposes of this exercise, I use the style “W” for its simplicity, but it is worth noting that there are other, more robust options available, like style “B”.

rswm_q <- nb2listw(wm_q, style="W", zero.policy = TRUE)
rswm_q
Characteristics of weights list object:
Neighbour list object:
Number of regions: 88 
Number of nonzero links: 448 
Percentage nonzero weights: 5.785124 
Average number of links: 5.090909 

Weights style: W 
Weights constants summary:
   n   nn S0       S1       S2
W 88 7744 88 37.86334 365.9147

I use the zero.policy=TRUE option in spdep package, which allows handling regions without neighbors. Caution is needed with this option to avoid overlooking missing neighbors, as setting zero.policy=FALSE would result in an error for such cases. To examine the weights of the first polygon’s neighbors, I use a specific command to observe how these weights were allocated.

rswm_q$weights[10]
[[1]]
[1] 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125

Each neighbor is assigned a weight of 0.125. This implies that in the calculation of average neighboring income values, the income of each neighbor is multiplied by 0.2 and then summed up. This approach of assigning equal weights ensures a uniform influence of each neighbor in the overall computation.

Additionally, I apply a similar method to create a row-standardized distance weight matrix. For this, I utilize a specific R code chunk, to standardize the weights based on distance, ensuring that the influence of each neighbor is adjusted according to their proximity. This technique is particularly useful in spatial analyses where distance plays a crucial role in determining the relationships between different areas.

rswm_ids <- nb2listw(wm_q, glist=ids, style="B", zero.policy=TRUE)
rswm_ids
Characteristics of weights list object:
Neighbour list object:
Number of regions: 88 
Number of nonzero links: 448 
Percentage nonzero weights: 5.785124 
Average number of links: 5.090909 

Weights style: B 
Weights constants summary:
   n   nn       S0        S1     S2
B 88 7744 8.786867 0.3776535 3.8137
rswm_ids$weights[1]
[[1]]
[1] 0.01535405 0.03916350 0.01820896 0.02807922 0.01145113
summary(unlist(rswm_ids$weights))
    Min.  1st Qu.   Median     Mean  3rd Qu.     Max. 
0.008218 0.015088 0.018739 0.019614 0.022823 0.040338

3.8. Spatial lag with row-standardized weights

Note

Using a neighbor structure based on the non-zero elements of the spatial weights matrix W, a spatially lagged variable represents a weighted sum or weighted average of the neighboring values for that particular variable.

3.8.1. Spatial lag with row-standardized weights

Finally, we will calculate the average neighbor GDPPC (Gross Domestic Product Per Capita) value for each polygon. These values are commonly known as spatially lagged values.

GDPPC.lag <- lag.listw(rswm_q, hunan$GDPPC)
GDPPC.lag
 [1] 24847.20 22724.80 24143.25 27737.50 27270.25 21248.80 43747.00 33582.71
 [9] 45651.17 32027.62 32671.00 20810.00 25711.50 30672.33 33457.75 31689.20
[17] 20269.00 23901.60 25126.17 21903.43 22718.60 25918.80 20307.00 20023.80
[25] 16576.80 18667.00 14394.67 19848.80 15516.33 20518.00 17572.00 15200.12
[33] 18413.80 14419.33 24094.50 22019.83 12923.50 14756.00 13869.80 12296.67
[41] 15775.17 14382.86 11566.33 13199.50 23412.00 39541.00 36186.60 16559.60
[49] 20772.50 19471.20 19827.33 15466.80 12925.67 18577.17 14943.00 24913.00
[57] 25093.00 24428.80 17003.00 21143.75 20435.00 17131.33 24569.75 23835.50
[65] 26360.00 47383.40 55157.75 37058.00 21546.67 23348.67 42323.67 28938.60
[73] 25880.80 47345.67 18711.33 29087.29 20748.29 35933.71 15439.71 29787.50
[81] 18145.00 21617.00 29203.89 41363.67 22259.09 44939.56 16902.00 16930.00

In the previous section, we obtained the GDPPC (Gross Domestic Product Per Capita) of these five countries using the following code chunk.

nb1 <- wm_q[[1]]
nb1 <- hunan$GDPPC[nb1]
nb1
[1] 20981 34592 24473 21311 22879
Note

Question: Can you see the meaning of Spatial lag with row-standardized weights now?

The following code chunk appends the spatially lag GDPPC values onto hunan sf data frame.

lag.list <- list(hunan$NAME_3, lag.listw(rswm_q, hunan$GDPPC))
lag.res <- as.data.frame(lag.list)
colnames(lag.res) <- c("NAME_3", "lag GDPPC")
hunan <- left_join(hunan,lag.res)

The following table shows the average neighboring income values (stored in the Inc.lag object) for each county.

head(hunan)
Simple feature collection with 6 features and 7 fields
Geometry type: POLYGON
Dimension:     XY
Bounding box:  xmin: 110.4922 ymin: 28.61762 xmax: 112.3013 ymax: 30.12812
Geodetic CRS:  WGS 84
   NAME_2  ID_3  NAME_3   ENGTYPE_3  County GDPPC lag GDPPC
1 Changde 21098 Anxiang      County Anxiang 23667  24847.20
2 Changde 21100 Hanshou      County Hanshou 20981  22724.80
3 Changde 21101  Jinshi County City  Jinshi 34592  24143.25
4 Changde 21102      Li      County      Li 24473  27737.50
5 Changde 21103   Linli      County   Linli 25554  27270.25
6 Changde 21104  Shimen      County  Shimen 27137  21248.80
                        geometry
1 POLYGON ((112.0625 29.75523...
2 POLYGON ((112.2288 29.11684...
3 POLYGON ((111.8927 29.6013,...
4 POLYGON ((111.3731 29.94649...
5 POLYGON ((111.6324 29.76288...
6 POLYGON ((110.8825 30.11675...

The following code chunk is used to plot both GDPPC and spatial lag GDPPC for comparison.

gdppc <- qtm(hunan, "GDPPC")
lag_gdppc <- qtm(hunan, "lag GDPPC")
tmap_arrange(gdppc, lag_gdppc, asp=1, ncol=2)

3.8.2. Spatial lag as a sum of neighboring values

Following steps are performed to compute the spatial lag as a sum of neighboring values with binary weight. Initially, I revisit our neighbors list and proceed to assign binary weights. This entails applying a function that designates a binary weight of 1 to each neighboring unit. To explicitly incorporate these weights, I utilize the ‘glist =’ parameter within the nb2listw function.

The process commences by employing a function that attributes a value of 1 to each neighboring unit. This operation is facilitated using lapply, a function that I have consistently employed for manipulating the neighbor structure in previous sections. Essentially, lapply enables us to execute a specific function across each element within the neighbor structure.

b_weights <- lapply(wm_q, function(x) 0*x + 1)
b_weights2 <- nb2listw(wm_q, 
                       glist = b_weights, 
                       style = "B")
b_weights2
Characteristics of weights list object:
Neighbour list object:
Number of regions: 88 
Number of nonzero links: 448 
Percentage nonzero weights: 5.785124 
Average number of links: 5.090909 

Weights style: B 
Weights constants summary:
   n   nn  S0  S1    S2
B 88 7744 448 896 10224

With the proper weights assigned, lag.listw is used to compute a lag variable from the weight and GDPPC.

lag_sum <- list(hunan$NAME_3, lag.listw(b_weights2, hunan$GDPPC))
lag.res <- as.data.frame(lag_sum)
colnames(lag.res) <- c("NAME_3", "lag_sum GDPPC")

The following code chunk is used to examine the result.

lag_sum
[[1]]
 [1] "Anxiang"       "Hanshou"       "Jinshi"        "Li"           
 [5] "Linli"         "Shimen"        "Liuyang"       "Ningxiang"    
 [9] "Wangcheng"     "Anren"         "Guidong"       "Jiahe"        
[13] "Linwu"         "Rucheng"       "Yizhang"       "Yongxing"     
[17] "Zixing"        "Changning"     "Hengdong"      "Hengnan"      
[21] "Hengshan"      "Leiyang"       "Qidong"        "Chenxi"       
[25] "Zhongfang"     "Huitong"       "Jingzhou"      "Mayang"       
[29] "Tongdao"       "Xinhuang"      "Xupu"          "Yuanling"     
[33] "Zhijiang"      "Lengshuijiang" "Shuangfeng"    "Xinhua"       
[37] "Chengbu"       "Dongan"        "Dongkou"       "Longhui"      
[41] "Shaodong"      "Suining"       "Wugang"        "Xinning"      
[45] "Xinshao"       "Shaoshan"      "Xiangxiang"    "Baojing"      
[49] "Fenghuang"     "Guzhang"       "Huayuan"       "Jishou"       
[53] "Longshan"      "Luxi"          "Yongshun"      "Anhua"        
[57] "Nan"           "Yuanjiang"     "Jianghua"      "Lanshan"      
[61] "Ningyuan"      "Shuangpai"     "Xintian"       "Huarong"      
[65] "Linxiang"      "Miluo"         "Pingjiang"     "Xiangyin"     
[69] "Cili"          "Chaling"       "Liling"        "Yanling"      
[73] "You"           "Zhuzhou"       "Sangzhi"       "Yueyang"      
[77] "Qiyang"        "Taojiang"      "Shaoyang"      "Lianyuan"     
[81] "Hongjiang"     "Hengyang"      "Guiyang"       "Changsha"     
[85] "Taoyuan"       "Xiangtan"      "Dao"           "Jiangyong"    

[[2]]
 [1] 124236 113624  96573 110950 109081 106244 174988 235079 273907 256221
[11]  98013 104050 102846  92017 133831 158446 141883 119508 150757 153324
[21] 113593 129594 142149 100119  82884  74668  43184  99244  46549  20518
[31] 140576 121601  92069  43258 144567 132119  51694  59024  69349  73780
[41]  94651 100680  69398  52798 140472 118623 180933  82798  83090  97356
[51]  59482  77334  38777 111463  74715 174391 150558 122144  68012  84575
[61] 143045  51394  98279  47671  26360 236917 220631 185290  64640  70046
[71] 126971 144693 129404 284074 112268 203611 145238 251536 108078 238300
[81] 108870 108085 262835 248182 244850 404456  67608  33860
Note

Question: Can you understand the meaning of Spatial lag as a sum of neighboring values now?

The following code chunk is used to append the lag_sum GDPPC field into hunan sf data frame.

hunan <- left_join(hunan, lag.res)

The following code chunk is used to plot both the GDPPC and Spatial Lag Sum GDPPC for comparison.

gdppc <- qtm(hunan, "GDPPC")
lag_sum_gdppc <- qtm(hunan, "lag_sum GDPPC")
tmap_arrange(gdppc, lag_sum_gdppc, asp=1, ncol=2)

3.8.3. Spatial window average

To calculate the spatial window average using row-standardized weights, which includes the diagonal element, the neighbor structure in R needs to be modified. This involves adding the diagonal element to the neighbor list before assigning the weights.

To include the diagonal element in the neighbor list, include.self() function from the spdep package can be used. This step ensures that each unit is also considered as its own neighbor when computing the spatial window average.

wm_qs <- include.self(wm_q)

It is important to notice that when computing the spatial window average with row-standardized weights, including the diagonal element, the following statistics change:

  • Number of nonzero links increases to 536.

  • Percentage nonzero weights increases to approximately 6.92%.

  • Average number of links increases to approximately 6.09.

These changes indicate that by including the diagonal element, each unit is now considered as its own neighbor, leading to an increase in the number of links and weights.

The following code chunk is used to look at the neighbor list of area [1].

wm_qs[[1]]
[1]  1  2  3  4 57 85
Note

[1] has six neighbors instead of five.

The following code chunk utilizes nb2listw() function is used to obtain weights.

wm_qs <- nb2listw(wm_qs)
wm_qs
Characteristics of weights list object:
Neighbour list object:
Number of regions: 88 
Number of nonzero links: 536 
Percentage nonzero weights: 6.921488 
Average number of links: 6.090909 

Weights style: W 
Weights constants summary:
   n   nn S0       S1       S2
W 88 7744 88 30.90265 357.5308

Again, nb2listw() and glist() functions are used to explicitly assign weight values. Lastly, the lag variable from the weight structure and GDPPC variable is created.

lag_w_avg_gpdpc <- lag.listw(wm_qs, 
                             hunan$GDPPC)
lag_w_avg_gpdpc
 [1] 24650.50 22434.17 26233.00 27084.60 26927.00 22230.17 47621.20 37160.12
 [9] 49224.71 29886.89 26627.50 22690.17 25366.40 25825.75 30329.00 32682.83
[17] 25948.62 23987.67 25463.14 21904.38 23127.50 25949.83 20018.75 19524.17
[25] 18955.00 17800.40 15883.00 18831.33 14832.50 17965.00 17159.89 16199.44
[33] 18764.50 26878.75 23188.86 20788.14 12365.20 15985.00 13764.83 11907.43
[41] 17128.14 14593.62 11644.29 12706.00 21712.29 43548.25 35049.00 16226.83
[49] 19294.40 18156.00 19954.75 18145.17 12132.75 18419.29 14050.83 23619.75
[57] 24552.71 24733.67 16762.60 20932.60 19467.75 18334.00 22541.00 26028.00
[65] 29128.50 46569.00 47576.60 36545.50 20838.50 22531.00 42115.50 27619.00
[73] 27611.33 44523.29 18127.43 28746.38 20734.50 33880.62 14716.38 28516.22
[81] 18086.14 21244.50 29568.80 48119.71 22310.75 43151.60 17133.40 17009.33

Next, as.data.frame() function is used to convert the lag variable listw object into a data frame.

lag.list.wm_qs <- list(hunan$NAME_3, lag.listw(wm_qs, hunan$GDPPC))
lag_wm_qs.res <- as.data.frame(lag.list.wm_qs)
colnames(lag_wm_qs.res) <- c("NAME_3", "lag_window_avg GDPPC")
Note

The third command line on the code chunk above renames the field names of lag_wm_q1.res object into NAME_3 and lag_window_avg GDPPC respectively.

The following code chunk is used to append lag_window_avg GDPPC values onto hunan sf data.frame by using left_join() of dplyr package.

hunan <- left_join(hunan, lag_wm_qs.res)

The following code chunk utilizes kable() of knitr package to prepare a table to compare the values of lag GDPPC and Spatial window average.

hunan %>%
  select("County", "lag GDPPC", "lag_window_avg GDPPC") %>%
  kable()
County lag GDPPC lag_window_avg GDPPC geometry
Anxiang 24847.20 24650.50 POLYGON ((112.0625 29.75523…
Hanshou 22724.80 22434.17 POLYGON ((112.2288 29.11684…
Jinshi 24143.25 26233.00 POLYGON ((111.8927 29.6013,…
Li 27737.50 27084.60 POLYGON ((111.3731 29.94649…
Linli 27270.25 26927.00 POLYGON ((111.6324 29.76288…
Shimen 21248.80 22230.17 POLYGON ((110.8825 30.11675…
Liuyang 43747.00 47621.20 POLYGON ((113.9905 28.5682,…
Ningxiang 33582.71 37160.12 POLYGON ((112.7181 28.38299…
Wangcheng 45651.17 49224.71 POLYGON ((112.7914 28.52688…
Anren 32027.62 29886.89 POLYGON ((113.1757 26.82734…
Guidong 32671.00 26627.50 POLYGON ((114.1799 26.20117…
Jiahe 20810.00 22690.17 POLYGON ((112.4425 25.74358…
Linwu 25711.50 25366.40 POLYGON ((112.5914 25.55143…
Rucheng 30672.33 25825.75 POLYGON ((113.6759 25.87578…
Yizhang 33457.75 30329.00 POLYGON ((113.2621 25.68394…
Yongxing 31689.20 32682.83 POLYGON ((113.3169 26.41843…
Zixing 20269.00 25948.62 POLYGON ((113.7311 26.16259…
Changning 23901.60 23987.67 POLYGON ((112.6144 26.60198…
Hengdong 25126.17 25463.14 POLYGON ((113.1056 27.21007…
Hengnan 21903.43 21904.38 POLYGON ((112.7599 26.98149…
Hengshan 22718.60 23127.50 POLYGON ((112.607 27.4689, …
Leiyang 25918.80 25949.83 POLYGON ((112.9996 26.69276…
Qidong 20307.00 20018.75 POLYGON ((111.7818 27.0383,…
Chenxi 20023.80 19524.17 POLYGON ((110.2624 28.21778…
Zhongfang 16576.80 18955.00 POLYGON ((109.9431 27.72858…
Huitong 18667.00 17800.40 POLYGON ((109.9419 27.10512…
Jingzhou 14394.67 15883.00 POLYGON ((109.8186 26.75842…
Mayang 19848.80 18831.33 POLYGON ((109.795 27.98008,…
Tongdao 15516.33 14832.50 POLYGON ((109.9294 26.46561…
Xinhuang 20518.00 17965.00 POLYGON ((109.227 27.43733,…
Xupu 17572.00 17159.89 POLYGON ((110.7189 28.30485…
Yuanling 15200.12 16199.44 POLYGON ((110.9652 28.99895…
Zhijiang 18413.80 18764.50 POLYGON ((109.8818 27.60661…
Lengshuijiang 14419.33 26878.75 POLYGON ((111.5307 27.81472…
Shuangfeng 24094.50 23188.86 POLYGON ((112.263 27.70421,…
Xinhua 22019.83 20788.14 POLYGON ((111.3345 28.19642…
Chengbu 12923.50 12365.20 POLYGON ((110.4455 26.69317…
Dongan 14756.00 15985.00 POLYGON ((111.4531 26.86812…
Dongkou 13869.80 13764.83 POLYGON ((110.6622 27.37305…
Longhui 12296.67 11907.43 POLYGON ((110.985 27.65983,…
Shaodong 15775.17 17128.14 POLYGON ((111.9054 27.40254…
Suining 14382.86 14593.62 POLYGON ((110.389 27.10006,…
Wugang 11566.33 11644.29 POLYGON ((110.9878 27.03345…
Xinning 13199.50 12706.00 POLYGON ((111.0736 26.84627…
Xinshao 23412.00 21712.29 POLYGON ((111.6013 27.58275…
Shaoshan 39541.00 43548.25 POLYGON ((112.5391 27.97742…
Xiangxiang 36186.60 35049.00 POLYGON ((112.4549 28.05783…
Baojing 16559.60 16226.83 POLYGON ((109.7015 28.82844…
Fenghuang 20772.50 19294.40 POLYGON ((109.5239 28.19206…
Guzhang 19471.20 18156.00 POLYGON ((109.8968 28.74034…
Huayuan 19827.33 19954.75 POLYGON ((109.5647 28.61712…
Jishou 15466.80 18145.17 POLYGON ((109.8375 28.4696,…
Longshan 12925.67 12132.75 POLYGON ((109.6337 29.62521…
Luxi 18577.17 18419.29 POLYGON ((110.1067 28.41835…
Yongshun 14943.00 14050.83 POLYGON ((110.0003 29.29499…
Anhua 24913.00 23619.75 POLYGON ((111.6034 28.63716…
Nan 25093.00 24552.71 POLYGON ((112.3232 29.46074…
Yuanjiang 24428.80 24733.67 POLYGON ((112.4391 29.1791,…
Jianghua 17003.00 16762.60 POLYGON ((111.6461 25.29661…
Lanshan 21143.75 20932.60 POLYGON ((112.2286 25.61123…
Ningyuan 20435.00 19467.75 POLYGON ((112.0715 26.09892…
Shuangpai 17131.33 18334.00 POLYGON ((111.8864 26.11957…
Xintian 24569.75 22541.00 POLYGON ((112.2578 26.0796,…
Huarong 23835.50 26028.00 POLYGON ((112.9242 29.69134…
Linxiang 26360.00 29128.50 POLYGON ((113.5502 29.67418…
Miluo 47383.40 46569.00 POLYGON ((112.9902 29.02139…
Pingjiang 55157.75 47576.60 POLYGON ((113.8436 29.06152…
Xiangyin 37058.00 36545.50 POLYGON ((112.9173 28.98264…
Cili 21546.67 20838.50 POLYGON ((110.8822 29.69017…
Chaling 23348.67 22531.00 POLYGON ((113.7666 27.10573…
Liling 42323.67 42115.50 POLYGON ((113.5673 27.94346…
Yanling 28938.60 27619.00 POLYGON ((113.9292 26.6154,…
You 25880.80 27611.33 POLYGON ((113.5879 27.41324…
Zhuzhou 47345.67 44523.29 POLYGON ((113.2493 28.02411…
Sangzhi 18711.33 18127.43 POLYGON ((110.556 29.40543,…
Yueyang 29087.29 28746.38 POLYGON ((113.343 29.61064,…
Qiyang 20748.29 20734.50 POLYGON ((111.5563 26.81318…
Taojiang 35933.71 33880.62 POLYGON ((112.0508 28.67265…
Shaoyang 15439.71 14716.38 POLYGON ((111.5013 27.30207…
Lianyuan 29787.50 28516.22 POLYGON ((111.6789 28.02946…
Hongjiang 18145.00 18086.14 POLYGON ((110.1441 27.47513…
Hengyang 21617.00 21244.50 POLYGON ((112.7144 26.98613…
Guiyang 29203.89 29568.80 POLYGON ((113.0811 26.04963…
Changsha 41363.67 48119.71 POLYGON ((112.9421 28.03722…
Taoyuan 22259.09 22310.75 POLYGON ((112.0612 29.32855…
Xiangtan 44939.56 43151.60 POLYGON ((113.0426 27.8942,…
Dao 16902.00 17133.40 POLYGON ((111.498 25.81679,…
Jiangyong 16930.00 17009.33 POLYGON ((111.3659 25.39472…

Lastly, qtm() of tmap package is used to plot the lag_gdppc and w_ave_gdppc maps next to each other for quick comparison.

w_avg_gdppc <- qtm(hunan, "lag_window_avg GDPPC")
tmap_arrange(lag_gdppc, w_avg_gdppc, asp=1, ncol=2)

Note

Use the core tmap mapping functions for more effective comparison.

3.8.4. Spatial window sum

The spatial window sum is similar to the spatial window average, but it does not use row-standardized weights. Instead, it sums the values of neighboring units without adjusting for their total number or weights. This means that each neighboring unit contributes equally to the sum, regardless of its size or importance, making it a simpler form of spatial aggregation.

The following code chunk utilizes include.self() function from spdep package to add the diagonal element to the neighbor list.

wm_qs <- include.self(wm_q)
wm_qs
Neighbour list object:
Number of regions: 88 
Number of nonzero links: 536 
Percentage nonzero weights: 6.921488 
Average number of links: 6.090909

Next, binary weights are assigned to the neighbor structure that includes the diagonal element.

b_weights <- lapply(wm_qs, function(x) 0*x + 1)
b_weights[1]
[[1]]
[1] 1 1 1 1 1 1
Note

[1] has six neighbors instead of five.

Again, nb2listw() and glist() functions are used to explicitly assign weight values.

b_weights2 <- nb2listw(wm_qs, 
                       glist = b_weights, 
                       style = "B")
b_weights2
Characteristics of weights list object:
Neighbour list object:
Number of regions: 88 
Number of nonzero links: 536 
Percentage nonzero weights: 6.921488 
Average number of links: 6.090909 

Weights style: B 
Weights constants summary:
   n   nn  S0   S1    S2
B 88 7744 536 1072 14160

With the new weight structure, lag.listw() is used to compute the lag variable.

w_sum_gdppc <- list(hunan$NAME_3, lag.listw(b_weights2, hunan$GDPPC))
w_sum_gdppc
[[1]]
 [1] "Anxiang"       "Hanshou"       "Jinshi"        "Li"           
 [5] "Linli"         "Shimen"        "Liuyang"       "Ningxiang"    
 [9] "Wangcheng"     "Anren"         "Guidong"       "Jiahe"        
[13] "Linwu"         "Rucheng"       "Yizhang"       "Yongxing"     
[17] "Zixing"        "Changning"     "Hengdong"      "Hengnan"      
[21] "Hengshan"      "Leiyang"       "Qidong"        "Chenxi"       
[25] "Zhongfang"     "Huitong"       "Jingzhou"      "Mayang"       
[29] "Tongdao"       "Xinhuang"      "Xupu"          "Yuanling"     
[33] "Zhijiang"      "Lengshuijiang" "Shuangfeng"    "Xinhua"       
[37] "Chengbu"       "Dongan"        "Dongkou"       "Longhui"      
[41] "Shaodong"      "Suining"       "Wugang"        "Xinning"      
[45] "Xinshao"       "Shaoshan"      "Xiangxiang"    "Baojing"      
[49] "Fenghuang"     "Guzhang"       "Huayuan"       "Jishou"       
[53] "Longshan"      "Luxi"          "Yongshun"      "Anhua"        
[57] "Nan"           "Yuanjiang"     "Jianghua"      "Lanshan"      
[61] "Ningyuan"      "Shuangpai"     "Xintian"       "Huarong"      
[65] "Linxiang"      "Miluo"         "Pingjiang"     "Xiangyin"     
[69] "Cili"          "Chaling"       "Liling"        "Yanling"      
[73] "You"           "Zhuzhou"       "Sangzhi"       "Yueyang"      
[77] "Qiyang"        "Taojiang"      "Shaoyang"      "Lianyuan"     
[81] "Hongjiang"     "Hengyang"      "Guiyang"       "Changsha"     
[85] "Taoyuan"       "Xiangtan"      "Dao"           "Jiangyong"    

[[2]]
 [1] 147903 134605 131165 135423 134635 133381 238106 297281 344573 268982
[11] 106510 136141 126832 103303 151645 196097 207589 143926 178242 175235
[21] 138765 155699 160150 117145 113730  89002  63532 112988  59330  35930
[31] 154439 145795 112587 107515 162322 145517  61826  79925  82589  83352
[41] 119897 116749  81510  63530 151986 174193 210294  97361  96472 108936
[51]  79819 108871  48531 128935  84305 188958 171869 148402  83813 104663
[61] 155742  73336 112705  78084  58257 279414 237883 219273  83354  90124
[71] 168462 165714 165668 311663 126892 229971 165876 271045 117731 256646
[81] 126603 127467 295688 336838 267729 431516  85667  51028

Next, the lag variable listw object is converted into a data frame by using as.data.frame().

w_sum_gdppc.res <- as.data.frame(w_sum_gdppc)
colnames(w_sum_gdppc.res) <- c("NAME_3", "w_sum GDPPC")
Note

The second command line on the code chunk above renames the field names of w_sum_gdppc.res object into NAME_3 and w_sum GDPPC respectively.

The following code chunk is used to append w_sum GDPPC values onto hunan sf data.frame by using left_join() function of dplyr package.

hunan <- left_join(hunan, w_sum_gdppc.res)

The following code chunk utilizes kable() of knitr package to prepare a table to compare the values of lag GDPPC and Spatial window average.

hunan %>%
  select("County", "lag_sum GDPPC", "w_sum GDPPC") %>%
  kable()
County lag_sum GDPPC w_sum GDPPC geometry
Anxiang 124236 147903 POLYGON ((112.0625 29.75523…
Hanshou 113624 134605 POLYGON ((112.2288 29.11684…
Jinshi 96573 131165 POLYGON ((111.8927 29.6013,…
Li 110950 135423 POLYGON ((111.3731 29.94649…
Linli 109081 134635 POLYGON ((111.6324 29.76288…
Shimen 106244 133381 POLYGON ((110.8825 30.11675…
Liuyang 174988 238106 POLYGON ((113.9905 28.5682,…
Ningxiang 235079 297281 POLYGON ((112.7181 28.38299…
Wangcheng 273907 344573 POLYGON ((112.7914 28.52688…
Anren 256221 268982 POLYGON ((113.1757 26.82734…
Guidong 98013 106510 POLYGON ((114.1799 26.20117…
Jiahe 104050 136141 POLYGON ((112.4425 25.74358…
Linwu 102846 126832 POLYGON ((112.5914 25.55143…
Rucheng 92017 103303 POLYGON ((113.6759 25.87578…
Yizhang 133831 151645 POLYGON ((113.2621 25.68394…
Yongxing 158446 196097 POLYGON ((113.3169 26.41843…
Zixing 141883 207589 POLYGON ((113.7311 26.16259…
Changning 119508 143926 POLYGON ((112.6144 26.60198…
Hengdong 150757 178242 POLYGON ((113.1056 27.21007…
Hengnan 153324 175235 POLYGON ((112.7599 26.98149…
Hengshan 113593 138765 POLYGON ((112.607 27.4689, …
Leiyang 129594 155699 POLYGON ((112.9996 26.69276…
Qidong 142149 160150 POLYGON ((111.7818 27.0383,…
Chenxi 100119 117145 POLYGON ((110.2624 28.21778…
Zhongfang 82884 113730 POLYGON ((109.9431 27.72858…
Huitong 74668 89002 POLYGON ((109.9419 27.10512…
Jingzhou 43184 63532 POLYGON ((109.8186 26.75842…
Mayang 99244 112988 POLYGON ((109.795 27.98008,…
Tongdao 46549 59330 POLYGON ((109.9294 26.46561…
Xinhuang 20518 35930 POLYGON ((109.227 27.43733,…
Xupu 140576 154439 POLYGON ((110.7189 28.30485…
Yuanling 121601 145795 POLYGON ((110.9652 28.99895…
Zhijiang 92069 112587 POLYGON ((109.8818 27.60661…
Lengshuijiang 43258 107515 POLYGON ((111.5307 27.81472…
Shuangfeng 144567 162322 POLYGON ((112.263 27.70421,…
Xinhua 132119 145517 POLYGON ((111.3345 28.19642…
Chengbu 51694 61826 POLYGON ((110.4455 26.69317…
Dongan 59024 79925 POLYGON ((111.4531 26.86812…
Dongkou 69349 82589 POLYGON ((110.6622 27.37305…
Longhui 73780 83352 POLYGON ((110.985 27.65983,…
Shaodong 94651 119897 POLYGON ((111.9054 27.40254…
Suining 100680 116749 POLYGON ((110.389 27.10006,…
Wugang 69398 81510 POLYGON ((110.9878 27.03345…
Xinning 52798 63530 POLYGON ((111.0736 26.84627…
Xinshao 140472 151986 POLYGON ((111.6013 27.58275…
Shaoshan 118623 174193 POLYGON ((112.5391 27.97742…
Xiangxiang 180933 210294 POLYGON ((112.4549 28.05783…
Baojing 82798 97361 POLYGON ((109.7015 28.82844…
Fenghuang 83090 96472 POLYGON ((109.5239 28.19206…
Guzhang 97356 108936 POLYGON ((109.8968 28.74034…
Huayuan 59482 79819 POLYGON ((109.5647 28.61712…
Jishou 77334 108871 POLYGON ((109.8375 28.4696,…
Longshan 38777 48531 POLYGON ((109.6337 29.62521…
Luxi 111463 128935 POLYGON ((110.1067 28.41835…
Yongshun 74715 84305 POLYGON ((110.0003 29.29499…
Anhua 174391 188958 POLYGON ((111.6034 28.63716…
Nan 150558 171869 POLYGON ((112.3232 29.46074…
Yuanjiang 122144 148402 POLYGON ((112.4391 29.1791,…
Jianghua 68012 83813 POLYGON ((111.6461 25.29661…
Lanshan 84575 104663 POLYGON ((112.2286 25.61123…
Ningyuan 143045 155742 POLYGON ((112.0715 26.09892…
Shuangpai 51394 73336 POLYGON ((111.8864 26.11957…
Xintian 98279 112705 POLYGON ((112.2578 26.0796,…
Huarong 47671 78084 POLYGON ((112.9242 29.69134…
Linxiang 26360 58257 POLYGON ((113.5502 29.67418…
Miluo 236917 279414 POLYGON ((112.9902 29.02139…
Pingjiang 220631 237883 POLYGON ((113.8436 29.06152…
Xiangyin 185290 219273 POLYGON ((112.9173 28.98264…
Cili 64640 83354 POLYGON ((110.8822 29.69017…
Chaling 70046 90124 POLYGON ((113.7666 27.10573…
Liling 126971 168462 POLYGON ((113.5673 27.94346…
Yanling 144693 165714 POLYGON ((113.9292 26.6154,…
You 129404 165668 POLYGON ((113.5879 27.41324…
Zhuzhou 284074 311663 POLYGON ((113.2493 28.02411…
Sangzhi 112268 126892 POLYGON ((110.556 29.40543,…
Yueyang 203611 229971 POLYGON ((113.343 29.61064,…
Qiyang 145238 165876 POLYGON ((111.5563 26.81318…
Taojiang 251536 271045 POLYGON ((112.0508 28.67265…
Shaoyang 108078 117731 POLYGON ((111.5013 27.30207…
Lianyuan 238300 256646 POLYGON ((111.6789 28.02946…
Hongjiang 108870 126603 POLYGON ((110.1441 27.47513…
Hengyang 108085 127467 POLYGON ((112.7144 26.98613…
Guiyang 262835 295688 POLYGON ((113.0811 26.04963…
Changsha 248182 336838 POLYGON ((112.9421 28.03722…
Taoyuan 244850 267729 POLYGON ((112.0612 29.32855…
Xiangtan 404456 431516 POLYGON ((113.0426 27.8942,…
Dao 67608 85667 POLYGON ((111.498 25.81679,…
Jiangyong 33860 51028 POLYGON ((111.3659 25.39472…

Lastly, qtm() of tmap package is used to plot the lag_gdppc and w_ave_gdppc maps next to each other for quick comparison.

w_sum_gdppc <- qtm(hunan, "w_sum GDPPC")
tmap_arrange(lag_sum_gdppc, w_sum_gdppc, asp=1, ncol=2)

Note

Use the core tmap mapping functions for more effective comparison.